What was Pullman’s response to negotiations during the strike?

Pullman's response during the strike was to refuse to negotiate. This decision was significant because it demonstrated his unwillingness to engage with the workers' demands or to seek a compromise. The refusal to negotiate added to the tensions and escalated the conflict between the Pullman Company and the strikers, ultimately leading to a nationwide disruption that involved federal intervention. Pullman’s stance exemplified the broader labor disputes of the time, reflecting management's often rigid approach to labor relations and their resistance to addressing workers' grievances.

The other options present scenarios that did not occur. Accepting all terms would imply a willingness to compromise, which was contrary to Pullman’s approach. Proposing new terms would suggest a proactive stance in negotiations, which he did not take either. Calling for mediation would indicate an intention to resolve the conflict through an intermediary, rather than shutting down dialogue entirely. Thus, the choice to refuse negotiations highlights the conflict dynamics during the Pullman Strike.