What impact did the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 have on labor unions?

The Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 significantly impacted labor unions by implementing restrictions on their activities and allowing states the authority to enact right-to-work laws. This legislation aimed to balance the rights of workers and employers by curbing what Congress viewed as excessive union power and influence.

One of the key provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act was that it prohibited unions from engaging in certain forms of political activity, such as secondary boycotts and jurisdictional strikes, which were seen as disruptive measures against non-union employers or those not affiliated with the striking union. Additionally, the law allowed individual states to pass right-to-work laws, which prevent mandatory union membership or payment of union dues as a condition of employment. This weakened the financial base of unions and reduced their ability to organize effectively.

In contrast, the options suggesting encouragement for the formation of new unions, federal funding for labor activities, or mandates for union representation do not accurately represent the legislation's intent or effects. Instead, the Taft-Hartley Act sought to limit union power, demonstrating its dual focus on protecting the rights of workers while curbing union influence in the labor market.