What consequence did labor movements often face according to business leaders?

Labor movements frequently faced accusations of socialism and anarchism from business leaders as these leaders viewed collective action and organized labor as threats to the existing capitalist framework. In many cases, they characterized labor unions and their activities as radical or subversive, particularly when workers sought to unite for better wages, working conditions, or rights. Such accusations were a way for business leaders to delegitimize the movements and rally public opinion against them. This response was rooted in a fear that organized labor could disrupt the status quo, leading to broader societal changes that might challenge the power and profit structures of business.

The other choices do not reflect the common experiences of labor movements during times of significant tension with business leaders. Support from the government and increased public backing were often not the realities for labor movements; rather, they faced considerable opposition. Financial independence is not relevant in this context, as labor movements typically sought to gain better compensation and rights rather than independence from financial systems.